What about the release flow to crates.io?
https://crates.io/

What about the release flow to crates.io?
https://crates.io/

Which crate name do we wanna choose?

It seems that oci already several crates. oci_spec is the best, however, I think _ and - might be misunderstood, so I think oci_spec_rs is fine. What do you think?
https://crates.io/search?page=1&per_page=10&q=oci

It seems that _ is preferred over -.
rust-lang/api-guidelines#29 (comment)

oci_spec already exists: https://crates.io/crates/oci_spec

I'm also in favor of oci_spec_rs.

@utam0k how about reaching out to the maintainer of oci_spec to join efforts? This way we could re-use the crate name.

@saschagrunert I am very much in favor of cooperation. I'm sure the knowledge of this author will be put to great use.
However, I can't really imagine how we can cooperate. What kind of cooperation do you imagine?

@saschagrunert I am very much in favor of cooperation. I'm sure the knowledge of this author will be put to great use.
However, I can't really imagine how we can cooperate. What kind of cooperation do you imagine?

It looks like that the initial crate got no update since 2 years. For example we would also need the image (and maybe artifact) spec beside the runtime spec.

So asking directly @smiyaguchi, do you see a way that we can reuse the crate name and merge both positive sides of the repositories?

The image spec could certainly be integrated 👍

@saschagrunert Thank you for contacting me.

do you see a way that we can reuse the crate name and merge both positive sides of the repositories?

I have never repurposed a crate before, so I don't know if it would work, but would you like me to add the owner to the oci-spec crate?

I think this is a great project and I would be happy to help in any way I can.
If you have any other ideas, please let me know.

@saschagrunert Thank you for contacting me.

do you see a way that we can reuse the crate name and merge both positive sides of the repositories?

I have never repurposed a crate before, so I don't know if it would work, but would you like me to add the owner to the oci-spec crate?

This would be wonderful, thank you so much! ❤️ (please add @utam0k, too)

I think this is a great project and I would be happy to help in any way I can.
If you have any other ideas, please let me know.

Thank you! Yeah the integration of other parts of the spec is definitely a goal. Feel free to mention if you notice any gaps between your implementation and this one. We're happy to take the advantage of both.

Thank you for responding. Let's work together 🤝

Closing since the crate name point has been resolved.