New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bumped up macOS version #78
Conversation
Hmm, strange. We should remember to change it back to Could you reword your commit to |
Should I delete the branch and create a new one? |
Nooo... You shouldn't |
People should really learn to use Git properly lol. Look into rebasing. |
Alright thanks! Now I know that |
GitHub set the macOS-latest version to 10.15 while the actual latest version is macOS 11. This is a temporary fix to resolve Rosetta 2 issues since GitHubs macOS 10.15 only got the Xcode 11 SDK while Rosetta 2 works best with the macOS 11 target SDK
Done! But how can I refresh this PR? |
It happens automatically if you |
Is there a workaround, so the PR is updated by my remote branch without creating a new PR? Or is it just a matter of time? |
No the moment you Like just happened, your PR is now updated. |
Somehow the PR was locked by GitHub, so I needed to change the commit back to the PR one, reopen the PR and then push the new commit again, so it works. It says Cannot reopen PR with forced push |
I noticed that, strange. But normally you don't just close the PR if you want to update the branch, so it's fine 😉 |
Yeah, git is not my perfect tool, but I'm working on that. |
No problem, glad to see https://git-rebase.io helped you out at least 😉 |
Thanks for the info. |
Hm, strange, the Artefact is not building. While on your PR, the error disappeared a few minutes later |
Yeah because I changed the CI in that PR to fix that error. Once that's merged it'll be fixed for the future. |
Since GitHub hasn't updated macos-latest I bumped up the macOS version from 10.15 to 10.16
(For some reason, the macOS 10.15 CI uses the Xcode 11 SDK, while the macOS 10.16 CI uses the Xcode 12.X SDK, which lead to less compatibility with the Rosetta 2 interpreter)